seogoongie:

S P E E D showing off their choreography

timeofthedecade:

bigdaddyg-wil:

this guy pulled out his dick in front of like 5 billion feminist protestors holy shit

Some context for the idiots claiming the women are overreacting:

This occurred at a Slut Walk. For those not familiar with it, the Slut Walk is basically a peaceful protest seeking to eliminate the rape apologism so prevalent in society. The basis is that no woman is “asking for it,” with “it” being rape. It’s not a feminist protest; it’s a human rights protest.

Many of the protesters, as you can probably imagine, have dealt with sexual harassment or rape in their own lives. Many of them have structured their daily activities to avoid being raped. The gathering is supposed to be a place for them to feel empowered and able to recover in the company of those who understand what they’ve been through or who will not blame them.

Nobody at a Slut Walk will tell a survivor that it’s her fault. They will not ask what she was wearing to provoke her attacker. Nobody will say she had too much to drink. Nobody will tell the men in the group that they are inherently rapists themselves, and nobody will tell a male survivor that his experience “wasn’t really rape.”

Then, this fellow comes along. He sees this gathering of survivors and their supporters, and to him, it’s a joke. He sees feminazis. He sees girls who are taking “a bit of fun” too seriously. And what does he do? He exposes himself to this group of survivors and supporters - some of whom are, in fact, underage.

He sexually harasses literally hundreds of women in one act. Aside from public indecency, there was cruel intent in his actions. He wanted to make them uncomfortable. He wanted to “put them in their place.” Other photos from this event show him flipping the protesters off and laughing at their anger.

And there are still people defending his actions. There are those who still feel like these women were asking for itand that they deserved to be harassed for trying to claim they weren’t. There are those who feel that women should be taught a lesson this way, and they applaud this man’s actions.

So no, he didn’t pull out his dick in front of feminist protesters. He harassed dozens - if not hundreds - of rape survivors. The reaction to his actions alone outline the purpose of the Slut Walk.

For those of you still doubting whether what he did was wrong (and I do wonder if there’s something wrong with you, if you have doubts), let me give you an analogous situation. Imagine a gathering of black civil rights activists. Imagine Martin Luther King Jr., Malcolm X, Rosa Parks, and all their colleagues gathered together to demonstrate that being black did not make them lesser people. That being black and living in the South did not mean they were “asking” to be the target of hate crimes.

And at this gathering, a white man decides he should teach them a lesson by pointedly hanging a noose from the nearest tree and laughing at their anger. And other white men, laughing along with him, commend him for taking these activists down a peg.

That’s what happened here. It’s not an “OMG, I can’t believe he did that!” moment. It’s an “OMG, there are people who think this is okay” moment. And the fact is, it’s not. It never will be. And that’s the take home message of this ridiculous rant I’ve written up.

(Source: george-w-bushes)

haloweenberry:

moniquill:

Just a reminder:the natural diet of these birds is BONES. Not just bone marrow; actual bone shards. They pick up huge freaking bones from carcasses and drop them onto rocks until they get spiky pieces and then they swallow them. Their stomach acid dissolves bone. Also fact: when sufficiently threatened, they’ve been observed to deliberately puke on the threat.

These are the most metal fucking bird I have ever seen.

(Source: jenkristofu)

1 year ago · 362009 · reblog
Tagged #wtf

pootana:

mormondad:

oh my god

this still scares me

(Source: thedailywhat)

1 year ago · 62989 · reblog
Tagged #wtf

yeollips:

When my youtube decided to stop playing

1 year ago · 9 · reblog
Tagged #OMG Gikwang #WTF

chamilecc:

created by a friend of my friend’s

ace2039:

maybe one of the coolest things i’ve seen all day. 

(Source: azirae)

mycroftismight:

agronsy:

OK IF YOU SEE THESE POSTS:

DON’T GO ON THAT PERSONS BLOG THAT “REBLOGGED” IT BECAUSE YOU’LL REBLOG THOSE POSTS LIKE 100X AND CHANGE YOUR PASSWORD IF IT HAPPENS.

both are in portuguese and the last one says exacty that he’s a hacker and will give someone the blog of a person who reblogged that image. He says he’s doing it to irritate peope and also for revenge.

(Source: deantielarchive)

1 year ago · 15441 · reblog
Tagged #wtf

So..I got 5As,2Bs and some Cs for my SPM…This a reason to celebrate? 

mycroftismight:

148km:

shocklock:

Article I came across in the Australian MX Newspaper, written by Anna Brain. Click the images to enlarge. I have to say that, although it’s a little harsh in expression, I agree with the general intention of the article. “There is room for sexual tension, but intrigue, suspense and the undefined relationship between the doctor and the detective is what makes Sherlock, well, Sherlock.”

I thought I wasn’t going to post anything else related to this, but I guess this is my punishment for not blacklisting “Elementary.” So let me preface this by saying that yes, I do understand how you may not have faith in CBS to portray a platonic relationship between a man and a woman—except, no, actually, I don’t, but I guess I can see how you might assume that things might turn out that way (without any evidence or mention of the actual story—you lot are all regular Sherlocks!) if I tilt my head and squint a little bit. (The “but it’ll be a straight relationship rather than a queer one!” makes a hell of a lot more sense to me, but that’s already been addressed.) Even this article says “presumably” in reference to the relationship—because at this point, it’s all just speculation. Maybe I’ll be eating these words eventually, but at this point, there’s no evidence to support this assumption.  And even if there were some evidence, there are few enough official adaptations that explore a romantic relationship between Holmes and Watson. (I say “official” here because… well, fanfiction. But honestly, if you’re a shipper and you oppose this casting choice because a romantic relationship will spontaneously erupt out of ~nonexistent subtext in canon~ or that it would be okay if that happened but only if both characters were the same gender—fuck you. That’s it. Just fuck you.)

But this?

That is some of the most blatant fucking sexism I’ve seen regarding this casting news (Also, “will karate chop her way”? Congratulations on your stellar pan-Asian stereotype, author, have you maxed out your douchebag quota for the day?). Can we all fucking agree on that? If your kneejerk reaction to Lucy Liu being cast as Watson is to feel uncomfortable, I’d like for you to examine why that makes you uncomfortable. And if the only explanation you can come up with is that “the role was written for a man by a man” or that the Holmes-Watson relationship is “uniquely male” (seriously?????), I’ve got news for you: you might be a misogynist asshole.

^thank you

(Source: )